This page shows current Alerts for Blow-Up Fire Event potential.ISSUE DATE:
This is an Operational Tool. | Current daily SSTA charts (NOAA Coral Reef Watch) Click maps to see at full size on NOAA site.
|
LEVEL 1 | Current Alert Status: ![]() NO ALERT![]() [Click on image to enlarge.] ANALYSIS: Cooler weather has reduced fire risks in many areas, however some areas (such as NE NSW and Tasmania) are entering drought. It is of note that cool SSTAs are forming off the Australian coast. This is potentially a source of reduced rainfalls, as cooler air carries less moisture. If the warm SSTAs in the Tasman Sea were to dissipate, and if the forecast strong El Nino event were to form, then careful monitoring of the HPF would be essential. | ||
LEVEL 2 | Current Alert Status: ![]() LEVEL 2 ALERT HAS LARGELY ENDED.ANALYSIS: We have a complex mix of river flow classes. It is difficult to draw an overall conclusion, apart from the need to be careful with planned burns in some areas. ![]() NASA's GRACE system maps soil moisture based on gravity anomalies. Here is the current map: | ||
LEVEL 3
|
It is recommended that FBANs and other technical specialists learn more about BUFEs. Operations at Level 3 require use of the BUFO2 model to assess the potential for a BUFE during an on-going fire. This requires a series of data feeds specified in the model. It is suggested that FBANs should skill-up on using the BUFO2 model.
Click here for the BUFO2 worksheet.Click here for a PowerPoint presentation on BUFO2, from a workshop at the AFAC21 Conference.Could anyone using the spreadsheet during the HPF trail please copy their results to us. | ||
| Page prepared by: Adjunct Professor Rick McRae UNSW Canberra School of Science Bushfire Research Group r.mcrae@unsw.edu.au | ![]()
|
BASISThis work is based on both analyses of data from Black Summer and operational work. The structure of the four-tier Hierarchical Prediction System is designed to progress into smaller-scales of timeframe and function, shifting from seasonal outlook to incident operations: | ||
![]() HPF is described in a peer-reviewed paper in the October 2023 edition of the Australian Journal of Emergency Management. A follow-up paper reports on HPF performance in the following year. |
LEVEL 2 SOURCE DATAThe table and map below describe the stream flow reference sites used. | ||
| ||
| . | |
|
| 1. Clyde R at Brooman (site ID 216002) Min. level = 0.40 m. |
| ||
|
2. Macdonald R at Howes Valley (site ID 212021) Min. level = -0.10 m. This site has questionable data - the river is notorious for silting up after major wildfires. |
| ||
|
3. Goobarragandra R at Macs Crossing (site ID 41000261) Min. level = 0.90 m. |
| ||
|
4. Macalister R at Glencairn (site ID 225219) Min. level = 0.30 m. |
| ||
|
5. Towamba R at Towamba (site ID 220004) Min. level = 0.35 m. |
| ||
|
6. Kowmung R at Cedar Ford (site ID 212260) Min. level = 0.40 m. |
| ||
|
7. Mann R at Mitchell (site ID 204014) Min. level = 0.20 m. |
| ||
|
8. Clarence R at Paddys Flat (site ID 204051) Min. level = 0.55 m. |
| ||
|
9. Hastings R at Mt Seaview (site ID 207015 Min. level = 0.55 m. |
| ||
|
10. Barrington R at Bobs Crossing (site ID 208001) Min. level = 0.58 m. |
| ||
|
11. Murrumbidgee R above Tantangara Reservoir (site ID 410535) Min. level = 0.45 m. |
| ||
|
12. Tooma River at Pinegrove (site ID 401014B) Min. level = 0.88m. |
| ||
|
13. Shoalhaven R at Hillview (site ID 215208) Min. level = 0.45 m. |
| ||
|
14. Queanbeyan R at Tinderry (site ID 410734) Min. level = 0.70 m. |
| ||
|
15. Reedy Creek (site ID 403221) Min. level = 0.22 m. |
| ||
|
16. Wadbilliga R at Wadbilliga (site ID 218007) Min. level = 0.75 m. |
| ||
|
17. Gudgenby R at Mt Tennent (site ID 410731) Min. level = 0.45 m. |
| ||
|
18. Hopkins R at Ararat (site ID 236219) Min. level = 0.075 m. |
| ||
ARCHIVENote that when these are archived, the real-time SSTA maps are for the print date not the issue date.--- End of list --- |